Kamis, 07 Februari 2013

IN SEARCH OF SUSTAINABLE CONVENTIONAL AND ISLAMIC MICROFINANCE MODEL FOR MICRO ENTERPRISES



Ascarya and Widodo Cahyono

ABSTRACT
The role of Micro Enterprises (MEs) in Indonesia, especially after monetary crisis, considered as a safety valve in the process of national economic recovery both in enhancing economic growth and reducing unemployment rate. MEs have always been in difficulties to access loan or financing from the banking industry (conventional as well as Islamic financial institutions) for a number of reasons. This study is aimed to determine and evaluate several existing models of conventional and Islamic microfinance for MEs to find the best existing microfinance model.
The results show that the best conventional Grameen model is Koperasi Mitra Dhuafa, the best Islamic Grameen model is KUBE Sejahtera No.21, the best conventional rural bank model is BKK Purwodadi, the best Islamic rural bank model is Amanah Ummah, the best conventional micro banking unit model is BRI Unit, while the best Islamic micro banking unit model is BSM Warung Mikro. The overall best MFIs are Koperasi Mitra Dhuafa (cGrameen), BRI Unit (cMBU) and UGT (BMT). Moreover, the best financing program is held by KUBE (iGrameen), the best social-development program is held by KUBE (iGrameen), the best MFI performance is held by Amanah Ummah (Islamic Rural Bank), while the best outreach is held by BRI Unit (cMBU).
The most important sustainability criteria are: 1) Aid Independent (MFI Performance); 2) Coverage (Outreach);  3) Savings Program (Soc-Dev. Program); 4) Profitability (MFI Performance); 5) Risk Mitigation (Financing Program); 6) Social Services (Soc-Dev. Program); 7) Pick-Up Service (Financing Program); and 8) Avg. Financing (Outreach). Moreover, Cooperative-BMT model is the most balanced sustainable model, which is operated as a more social business institution.
JEL Classifications: G21, G28, O17
Keywords: Microfinance, Islamic Microfinance, Microfinance Institution, Micro Enterprises



1.    INTRODUCTION

1.1  Background
There are plenty researches and papers that have been conducted and discussed with regard to the positive relationship between micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and economic growth, their role in poverty alleviation, as well as their role in reducing unemployment rate. Compared to the large scale of business or enterprise, MSMEs are proven to be endured and resistant to the financial crises or macro-economic shocks.
The role of MSMEs, especially after monetary crisis, considered as a safety valve in the process of national economic recovery both in enhancing economic growth and reducing unemployment rate. In the research held by Central Bank of Indonesia in 2001 titled “Credit Crunch in Indonesia After Crisis: The Fact, Causal Factor and Policy Implication” published by Department of Economy and Monetary Policy Bank Indonesia in 2001, there existed an acknowledgment from our industrial Banking that credit distributed to SMEs[1] had minimum risk and – compare to large enterprises – SMEs has sound and better business performance.
Several data show the significance of MSMEs’ contribution towards Growth Domestic Product for about 58.17% in 2009. It is more than that of the contribution of large enterprises towards GDP. MSMEs sectors could absorb for about 96 million labors (97.30% labor force).
Table 1.1 Statistics of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in 2009

Number
GDP
Labor
Export
Micro
52,176,795
98.88%
32.68%
90,012,694
91.03%
1.51%
Small
546,675
1.04%
10.80%
3,521,073
3.56%
3.87%
Medium
41,133
0.08%
14.69%
2,677,565
2.71%
11.65%
Large
4,677
0.01%
41.83%
2,674,671
2.70%
82.98%
MSMEs
52,764,603
99.99%
58.17%
96,211,332
97.30%
17.02%
Source: Ministry of Cooperation and SMEs
Furthermore, the contribution of MSMEs to the national income through export activities reaches Rp162.25 trillion or 17.02% from the total national export. With its specialties – especially with its low financial capital –, MSMEs could produce in the short-term process. Having simple management and huge unit volume scattered in the whole nation, brought about MSMEs to have better resistant toward the fluctuation of business cycle. 
During 2005 – 2009, the MSMEs sectors have increased significantly in number (12.22%), in share of GDP (15.10%), in labor absorption (24.01%) as well as in share of export (47.05%), while on the contrary large enterprises have decreased in all segments. More interestingly, the biggest part of MSMEs is micro enterprises (MEs), which counted for 98.88% in number of enterprises, 32.68% share of GDP and 91.03% of labor force. Furthermore, the biggest increases in number (15.36%) and in employment (28.65%) have been in MEs, while these figures in SMEs have been decreased.
Tambunan (2004) stated seven years after economic crisis, the most valuable lessons that should be taken into account are: (1) Indonesian economy cannot depend mostly on large enterprises, (2) SMEs has more resistant compare to the large one and (3) there is no clear industrial policy that enhances economic growth and creates vocation for poor and unemployed people.
Despite historical success of MSMEs, there exist unresolved issues that need to be further discussed whereby MSMEs, especially micro enterprises (MEs) have always been in difficulties to access loan or financing from the banking industry (conventional as well as Islamic financial institutions) for a number of reasons.
Figure 1.1 Conventional Loan and Islamic Financing to MSMEs
Figure 1.1 shows that conventional loan share to MSMEs has been stable at 22%, while Islamic financing share to MSMEs has been declining. At the end of June 2011, productive conventional loan to MSMEs reached 22% of conventional bank portfolio or Rp.428.8 trillion, while productive Islamic financing to MSMEs reached 38% or Rp.31.3 trillion.
Table 1.2 Some Definitions of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

ASSET*
WORKING CAPITAL**
YEARLY REVENUE*
CREDIT LIMIT***
LABOR**
Micro
<50
85
< 300
<50
3.6
Small
50 -500
514
300-2500
50 – 500
16.6
Medium
500-10000
2000
2000-50000
500 – 5000
38.2
Source: * MSME Act No.20/2008; ** Survey 2005; *** Bank Indonesia Regulation
Note: in IDR Million, except Labor in number; USD1=Rp9000.
In addition, as shown in table 1.2, credit limit to micro enterprises is less than Rp.50 million, while commercial bank (conventional and Islamic) usually has minimum credit limit of Rp.50 million. Therefore, loan and financing portfolio of conventional and Islamic banking mostly have been extended to small and medium enterprises. Commercial banks usually serve MEs through their micro-banking unit, such as BRI Unit and BSM Warung Mikro, which according to the ministry of cooperative and SME (for 2010 up to October 2010) has been amounted to 18% of MSMEs portfolio or Rp.28.1 trillion.
Furthermore, within Rp50 million credit limit, there are wide ranges of MEs variations. Mohamad (2011) finds that 70 percent of 52.18 million MEs need loan below Rp5 million with low penetration, while 30 percent of MEs need loan up to Rp50 million.
Certainly, limit credit formula ranging < Rp.50 million for the micro-enterprise should be reviewed carefully as so many poor or low-income society only need credit for about Rp300.000 - Rp1 million, as also suggested by Ascarya and Sanrego (2007). Compare to Grameen Bank established by Dr Muhammad Yunus, they do give credit for micro-enterprises not more than US$200 (Rp1.80 million with exchange rate Rp9000 = US$1).
Nevertheless, there are various conventional and Islamic microfinance institutions that specifically serve micro enterprises for-profit or not-for-profit motives, ranging from Grameen model, cooperation model, rural bank model, as well as micro unit of commercial bank model. These institutions, however, still could not meet the need of 52.18 million MEs. Millions of MEs still could not access credit or financing from conventional or Islamic microfinance institutions.
It is based on these issues; this study is trying to analyze and discover the real problem of MEs, specifically to find a sustainable conventional and Islamic Bank microfinance model for them, which can be replicated throughout Indonesia, to be able to serve all financial services needed by all MEs.   
1.2  Objective
The objective of this study is first, to identify the salient characteristics of sustainable Islamic microfinance model which able to support MEs financing problems systematically and progressively. Second, this study will determine and evaluate several existing models of Islamic microfinance for MEs to find the best existing Islamic microfinance model, and third, this study will propose sustainable Islamic microfinance model which is suitable for MEs to progress gradually, feasible for Islamic Financial Institutions, as well as sustainable in the long run.

1.3  Methodology
For the first and second objectives, this study will apply Analytic Network Process (ANP) method with three steps. First, focus group discussion (FGD) and/or in-depth interview will be conducted with various stakeholders, such as micro-enterprises, Islamic banks, experts, academicians, as well as regulators of MSMEs and Islamic bank, to fully understand the real problems and to identify factors causing financing problems of MEs. Second, the results of the first steps will be used to develop an appropriate ANP network and its questionnaires to obtain proper data from MEs and Islamic bank. Third, ANP analysis will be applied to set priority on alternative solutions as well as policies and strategies to formulate optimal policy recommendations. Moreover, for the third objective, this study will apply descriptive analysis based on ANP results, in-depth interviews and Focus Group Discussions, to formulate microfinance model for MEs.

1.4  Importance of the Study
The results of this study are expected to be beneficial for various stakeholders, especially for authorities and regulators of micro-enterprises and Islamic financial institutions (Islamic banks, Islamic rural banks and BMTs), to formulate policies and strategies to improve access and availability of Islamic microfinance for MEs. This study will also be beneficial for micro-enterprises to improve from their weaknesses. Moreover, this study will also become an addition to the academic literatures on Islamic microfinance.  


[1] Micro enterprises sometimes are grouped together with Small enterprises, so that MSMEs sometime is termed as SMEs.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar